You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bridging the gap between basic science and clinical practice: The role of organizations in addressing clinician barriers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-35 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Megan Beckett, Elaine Quiter, Gery Ryan, Claude Berrebi, Stephanie Taylor, Michelle Cho, Harold Pincus, Katherine Kahn |
| Abstract |
New National Institutes of Health policies call for expansion of practice-based research to improve the clinical research enterprise and facilitate dissemination of evidence-based medicine. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 31% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 17% |
| Psychology | 7 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,925,375
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,172
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,264
of 108,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.