↓ Skip to main content

Steps/day translation of the moderate-to-vigorous physical activity guideline for children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
55 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Steps/day translation of the moderate-to-vigorous physical activity guideline for children and adolescents
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-10-49
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc A Adams, William D Johnson, Catrine Tudor-Locke

Abstract

An evidence-based steps/day translation of U.S. federal guidelines for youth to engage in ≥60 minutes/day of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) would help health researchers, practitioners, and lay professionals charged with increasing youth's physical activity (PA). The purpose of this study was to determine the number of free-living steps/day (both raw and adjusted to a pedometer scale) that correctly classified children (6-11 years) and adolescents (12-17 years) as meeting the 60-minute MVPA guideline using the 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) accelerometer data, and to evaluate the 12,000 steps/day recommendation recently adopted by the President's Challenge Physical Activity and Fitness Awards Program.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 237 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 15%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 53 22%
Unknown 49 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 60 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 8%
Social Sciences 18 7%
Psychology 15 6%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 69 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2021.
All research outputs
#959,808
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#311
of 2,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,883
of 210,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#4
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.