You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protocol for a systematic review of prognosis after mild traumatic brain injury: an update of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force findings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-1-17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carol Cancelliere, J David Cassidy, Pierre Côté, Cesar A Hincapié, Jan Hartvigsen, Linda J Carroll, Connie Marras, Eleanor Boyle, Vicki Kristman, Ryan Hung, Britt-Marie Stålnacke, Peter Rumney, Victor Coronado, Lena W Holm, Jörgen Borg, Catharina Nygren-de Boussard, Jean-Luc af Geijerstam, Michelle Keightley |
| Abstract |
Mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) is a major public-health concern and represents 70-90% of all treated traumatic brain injuries. The last best-evidence synthesis, conducted by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Neurotrauma, Prevention, Management and Rehabilitation in 2002, found few quality studies on prognosis. The objective of this review is to update these findings. Specifically, we aim to describe the course, identify modifiable prognostic factors, determine long-term sequelae, and identify effects of interventions for MTBI. Finally, we will identify gaps in the literature, and make recommendations for future research. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Researcher | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 34 | 25% |
| Unknown | 19 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 36% |
| Psychology | 17 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2012.
All research outputs
#20,190,878
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,903
of 1,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,859
of 156,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.