You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome analyses of the wheat yellow (stripe) rust pathogen Puccinia striiformis f. sp. triticireveal polymorphic and haustorial expressed secreted proteins as candidate effectors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-270 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dario Cantu, Vanesa Segovia, Daniel MacLean, Rosemary Bayles, Xianming Chen, Sophien Kamoun, Jorge Dubcovsky, Diane GO Saunders, Cristobal Uauy |
| Abstract |
Wheat yellow (stripe) rust caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici (PST) is one of the most devastating diseases of wheat worldwide. To design effective breeding strategies that maximize the potential for durable disease resistance it is important to understand the molecular basis of PST pathogenicity. In particular, the characterisation of the structure, function and evolutionary dynamics of secreted effector proteins that are detected by host immune receptors can help guide and prioritize breeding efforts. However, to date, our knowledge of the effector repertoire of cereal rust pathogens is limited. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 29% |
| United States | 5 | 21% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 46% |
| Scientists | 11 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 256 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 27% |
| Researcher | 57 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 182 | 67% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 12% |
| Engineering | 4 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 42 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2016.
All research outputs
#2,568,298
of 25,144,989 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#730
of 11,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,655
of 201,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#9
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,144,989 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,173 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.