↓ Skip to main content

Inequities in access to depression treatment: results of the Brazilian National Health Survey – PNS

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inequities in access to depression treatment: results of the Brazilian National Health Survey – PNS
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12939-016-0446-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Souza Lopes, Natália Hellwig, Gulnar de Azevedo e Silva, Paulo Rossi Menezes

Abstract

Despite depression being one of the most prevalent mental disorders in the world, access to treatment is still insufficient, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The aim of this study is to investigate differences in access to treatment for depression according to socio-demographic characteristics, geographical area and multi-morbidity in a nationally representative sample of individuals with depression. This study analyses data from the National Health Survey (Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde - PNS), a Brazilian household-based nationwide survey, which comprises 60,202 adults (aged 18 years or older). Depression was evaluated through the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Prevalence Ratios and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated using Poisson regression. The general prevalence of depression was 7.9 % (95 % CI 7.5 to 8.3). Among those with depression, 78.8 % did not receive any treatment, and 14.1 % received only pharmacotherapy. Multivariable analyses showed that being female, white, aged between 30 and 69 years, living in regions other than the North, having higher education and having multi-morbidities were independently associated with higher likelihood of access to any treatment. Most Brazilians with clinically relevant depressive symptoms are not receiving any treatment. Access to care is unequal, with the poor and those living in low resource areas having higher difficulties to access mental health care. Understanding these disparities is important for the provision of effective interventions aimed at reducing the prevalence of depression and inequities in access to mental health care.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Unknown 219 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 17%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Researcher 16 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 79 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 11%
Psychology 19 9%
Social Sciences 14 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 96 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,355,479
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,862
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#350,325
of 417,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#42
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.