↓ Skip to main content

Cross-cultural French adaptation and validation of the Impact On Family Scale (IOFS)

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cross-cultural French adaptation and validation of the Impact On Family Scale (IOFS)
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-11-67
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raphaël Boudas, Jérémie Jégu, Bruno Grollemund, Elvire Quentel, Anne Danion-Grilliat, Michel Velten

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The IOFS (Impact On Family Scale) questionnaire is a useful instrument to assess the impact of chronic childhood conditions on general family quality of life. As this instrument was not validated in French, we proposed to translate, adapt and validate the IOFS questionnaire for clinical and research use in French-speaking populations. FINDINGS: The sample studied comprised French-speaking parents with a child presenting a cleft lip or cleft lip and palate, aged 6 to 12 years and treated in the University Hospital of Strasbourg, France. The 15-item version of the IOFS was translated into French and then sent to the parents by post. The structure of the measure was studied using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and test-retest reliability was studied by calculating the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).A total of 209 parents answered the questionnaire. Its acceptability was good, with 67.9% of mothers and 59.9% of fathers answering the questionnaire. EFA identified one main factor that explained 77% of the variance. Internal consistency was good, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.93. Finally, the ICC values were 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.66--0.85) and 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.80--0.92) for inter- and intra-observer reliability respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The French version of the IOFS questionnaire exhibited very good psychometric properties. For practitioners, this instrument will facilitate the assessment of the impact of chronic childhood conditions on quality of life among French-speaking families.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 19%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 40%
Psychology 12 19%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2013.
All research outputs
#18,337,420
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,666
of 2,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,138
of 195,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.