You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Home-based voluntary HIV counselling and testing found highly acceptable and to reduce inequalities
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-347 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wilbroad Mutale, Charles Michelo, Marte Jürgensen, Knut Fylkesnes |
Abstract |
Low uptake of voluntary HIV counselling and testing (VCT) in sub-Saharan Africa is raising acceptability concerns which might be associated with ways by which it is offered. We investigated the acceptability of home-based delivery of counselling and HIV testing in urban and rural populations in Zambia where VCT has been offered mostly from local clinics. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 141 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 27 | 19% |
Researcher | 26 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 16% |
Unknown | 24 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 32% |
Social Sciences | 23 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 3% |
Other | 21 | 15% |
Unknown | 29 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2014.
All research outputs
#6,258,258
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,553
of 14,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,868
of 93,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#35
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.