↓ Skip to main content

Home-based voluntary HIV counselling and testing found highly acceptable and to reduce inequalities

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Home-based voluntary HIV counselling and testing found highly acceptable and to reduce inequalities
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-347
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilbroad Mutale, Charles Michelo, Marte Jürgensen, Knut Fylkesnes

Abstract

Low uptake of voluntary HIV counselling and testing (VCT) in sub-Saharan Africa is raising acceptability concerns which might be associated with ways by which it is offered. We investigated the acceptability of home-based delivery of counselling and HIV testing in urban and rural populations in Zambia where VCT has been offered mostly from local clinics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 141 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 19%
Researcher 26 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 24 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 32%
Social Sciences 23 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 29 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2014.
All research outputs
#6,258,258
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,553
of 14,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,868
of 93,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#35
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.