You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The effectiveness of computer reminders for improving quality assessment for point-of-care testing in general practice—a randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-47 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard, Volkert Siersma, Susanne Reventlow, Ruth Ertmann, Peter Felding, Frans Boch Waldorff |
Abstract |
Computer reminders are increasingly being applied in efforts to improve quality and patient safety. However, research is still needed to establish the effectiveness of different kinds of reminders in various settings. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of computer reminders for improving adherence to a quality assessment scheme for point-of-care testing in general practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Australia | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 46 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
Researcher | 5 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 23% |
Unknown | 10 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 48% |
Computer Science | 4 | 8% |
Psychology | 3 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2013.
All research outputs
#7,632,590
of 25,214,112 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,189
of 1,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,802
of 200,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#25
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,214,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.