You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating complex interventions in End of Life Care: the MORECare Statement on good practice generated by a synthesis of transparent expert consultations and systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-111 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Irene J Higginson, Catherine J Evans, Gunn Grande, Nancy Preston, Myfanwy Morgan, Paul McCrone, Penney Lewis, Peter Fayers, Richard Harding, Matthew Hotopf, Scott A Murray, Hamid Benalia, Marjolein Gysels, Morag Farquhar, Chris Todd |
| Abstract |
Despite being a core business of medicine, end of life care (EoLC) is neglected. It is hampered by research that is difficult to conduct with no common standards. We aimed to develop evidence-based guidance on the best methods for the design and conduct of research on EoLC to further knowledge in the field. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 28 | 44% |
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Rwanda | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 23% |
| Scientists | 11 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 272 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 46 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 12% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 57 | 20% |
| Unknown | 57 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Psychology | 12 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Unknown | 75 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,114,744
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#791
of 4,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,375
of 206,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#21
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.