You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of fed- versus fasted state resistance training during Ramadan on body composition and selected metabolic parameters in bodybuilders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-10-23 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Khaled Trabelsi, Stephen R Stannard, Zohra Ghlissi, Ronald J Maughan, Choumous Kallel, Kamel Jamoussi, Khaled M Zeghal, Ahmed Hakim |
| Abstract |
Muslim bodybuilders often continue training during Ramadan. However, the effect of resistance training in a fasted versus a fed state during Ramadan on body composition and metabolic parameters in bodybuilders is not well known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of resistance training in a fasted versus a fed state during Ramadan on body composition and metabolic parameters in bodybuilders. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 14% |
| Saudi Arabia | 4 | 8% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Grenada | 1 | 2% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 12% |
| Scientists | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 135 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Professor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 22% |
| Unknown | 24 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 31 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2024.
All research outputs
#697,168
of 25,466,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#192
of 948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,020
of 448,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#181
of 851 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,466,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 851 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.