↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review of economic evaluations of human cell-derived wound care products for the treatment of venous leg and diabetic foot ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic review of economic evaluations of human cell-derived wound care products for the treatment of venous leg and diabetic foot ulcers
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-9-115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Astrid Langer, Wolf Rogowski

Abstract

Tissue engineering is an emerging field. Novel bioengineered skin substitutes and genetically derived growth factors offer innovative approaches to reduce the burden of diabetic foot and venous leg ulcers for both patients and health care systems. However, they frequently are very costly. Based on a systematic review of the literature, this study assesses the cost-effectiveness of these growth factors and tissue-engineered artificial skin for treating chronic wounds.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Colombia 2 1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 175 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 17%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 42 22%
Unknown 20 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 12%
Engineering 16 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Other 40 21%
Unknown 25 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,588,171
of 20,439,515 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#586
of 6,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,754
of 171,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,439,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them