You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic review of economic evaluations of human cell-derived wound care products for the treatment of venous leg and diabetic foot ulcers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-9-115 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Astrid Langer, Wolf Rogowski |
| Abstract |
Tissue engineering is an emerging field. Novel bioengineered skin substitutes and genetically derived growth factors offer innovative approaches to reduce the burden of diabetic foot and venous leg ulcers for both patients and health care systems. However, they frequently are very costly. Based on a systematic review of the literature, this study assesses the cost-effectiveness of these growth factors and tissue-engineered artificial skin for treating chronic wounds. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 192 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 42 | 20% |
| Unknown | 31 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 11% |
| Engineering | 16 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 41 | 20% |
| Unknown | 35 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,803,277
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#657
of 7,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,099
of 110,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.