You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of older and newer generations of ActiGraph accelerometers with the normal filter and the low frequency extension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-10-51 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelli L Cain, Terry L Conway, Marc A Adams, Lisa E Husak, James F Sallis |
| Abstract |
Many studies used the older ActiGraph (7164) for physical activity measurement, but this model has been replaced with newer ones (e.g., GT3X+). The assumption that new generation models are more accurate has been questioned, especially for measuring lower intensity levels. The low-frequency extension (LFE) increases the low-intensity sensitivity of newer models, but its comparability with older models is unknown. This study compared step counts and physical activity collected with the 7164 and GT3X + using the Normal Filter and the LFE (GT3X+N and GT3X+LFE, respectively). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 23% |
| Researcher | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 21% |
| Unknown | 14 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 32 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 15% |
| Psychology | 11 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2013.
All research outputs
#15,270,698
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,777
of 1,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,486
of 194,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#24
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.