↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiology of noninvasive mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory failure - a retrospective population-based study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Emergency Medicine, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epidemiology of noninvasive mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory failure - a retrospective population-based study
Published in
BMC Emergency Medicine, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-227x-13-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shihan Wang, Balwinder Singh, Lin Tian, Michelle Biehl, Ivaylo L Krastev, Marija Kojicic, Guangxi Li

Abstract

Noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) is a front-line therapy for the management of acute respiratory failure (ARF) in the intensive care units. However, the data on factors and outcomes associated with the use of NIV in ARF patients is lacking. Therefore, we aimed to determine the utilization of NIV for ARF in a population-based study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 103 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 19%
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 6 6%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 28 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Psychology 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 34 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2013.
All research outputs
#13,383,750
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from BMC Emergency Medicine
#378
of 746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,548
of 199,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Emergency Medicine
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.