↓ Skip to main content

Effects of moxibustion for constipation treatment: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Chinese Medicine, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 327)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of moxibustion for constipation treatment: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Published in
Chinese Medicine, January 2010
DOI 10.1186/1749-8546-5-28
Pubmed ID
Authors

Myeong Soo Lee, Tae-Young Choi, Ji-Eun Park, Edzard Ernst

Abstract

Several studies reported that moxibustion was effective in treating constipation. This systematic review assesses the clinical evidence for or against moxibustion for treating constipation. Twelve databases were searched from their inception to March 2010. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included if they compared moxibustion with placebo, sham treatment, drug therapy or no treatment. The methodological quality of these RCTs was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias analysis. All three RCTs included in the study had a high risk of bias. Two included studies found favorable effects of moxibustion. The third RCT showed significant effects in the moxibustion group. Given that the methodological quality of all RCTs was poor, the results from the present review are insufficient to suggest that moxibustion is an effective treatment for constipation. More rigorous studies are warranted.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 4%
Australia 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 18%
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Master 3 11%
Professor 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,444,159
of 15,094,232 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Medicine
#14
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,158
of 154,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,094,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them