↓ Skip to main content

Evo-devo of human adolescence: beyond disease models of early puberty

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evo-devo of human adolescence: beyond disease models of early puberty
Published in
BMC Medicine, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ze'ev Hochberg, Jay Belsky

Abstract

Despite substantial heritability in pubertal development, much variation remains to be explained, leaving room for the influence of environmental factors to adjust its phenotypic trajectory in the service of fitness goals. Utilizing evolutionary development biology (evo-devo), we examine adolescence as an evolutionary life-history stage in its developmental context. We show that the transition from the preceding stage of juvenility entails adaptive plasticity in response to energy resources, other environmental cues, social needs of adolescence and maturation toward youth and adulthood. Using the evolutionary theory of socialization, we show that familial psychosocial stress fosters a fast life history and reproductive strategy rather than early maturation being just a risk factor for aggression and delinquency. Here we explore implications of an evolutionary-developmental-endocrinological-anthropological framework for theory building, while illuminating new directions for research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
Canada 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 140 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 21%
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Student > Master 12 8%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 15%
Social Sciences 17 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 9%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 34 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,365,254
of 25,305,422 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,463
of 3,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,107
of 198,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#54
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,305,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.