You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-13-55 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lidewij Henneman, Jan C Oosterwijk, Christi J van Asperen, Fred H Menko, Caroline F Ockhuysen-Vermey, Piet J Kostense, Liesbeth Claassen, Daniëlle RM Timmermans |
| Abstract |
Inadequate understanding of risk among counselees is a common problem in familial cancer clinics. It has been suggested that graphical displays can help counselees understand cancer risks and subsequent decision-making. We evaluated the effects of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format on counselees' understanding, psychological well-being, and preventive intentions.Design: Multicenter controlled trial.Setting: Three familial cancer clinics in the Netherlands. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 22% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 20% |
| Psychology | 10 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2013.
All research outputs
#5,427,761
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#456
of 1,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,526
of 192,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#8
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,981 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.