↓ Skip to main content

Antibiograms from community-acquired uropathogens in Gulu, northern Uganda - a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiograms from community-acquired uropathogens in Gulu, northern Uganda - a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-13-193
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles O Odongo, Denis A Anywar, Kenneth Luryamamoi, Pancras Odongo

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are common in clinical practice and empirical treatment is largely employed due to predictability of pathogens. However, variations in antibiotic sensitivity patterns do occur, and documentation is needed to inform local empirical therapy. The current edition of the Uganda Clinical Guidelines recommends amoxicillin or cotrimoxazole as choice drugs for empirical treatment of community-acquired UTI. From our clinical observations, we suspected that this recommendation was not effective in our setting. In order to examine validity, we sought to identify bacteria from community-acquired infections and determine their susceptibility against these antibiotics plus a range of potentially useful alternatives for treatment of UTI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kazakhstan 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 142 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Other 11 8%
Researcher 10 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 47 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 34%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 52 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2013.
All research outputs
#12,875,786
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,983
of 7,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,214
of 192,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#59
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.