↓ Skip to main content

Impact of educational intervention on willingness-to-pay for health insurance: A study of informal sector workers in urban Bangladesh

Overview of attention for article published in Health Economics Review, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of educational intervention on willingness-to-pay for health insurance: A study of informal sector workers in urban Bangladesh
Published in
Health Economics Review, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/2191-1991-3-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jahangir AM Khan, Sayem Ahmed

Abstract

The reliance on out-of-pocket payments for health services leads to a catastrophic burden for many households in Bangladesh. The World Health Organization suggests that risk-pooling mechanisms should be used for financing healthcare. Like many low-income countries (LIC), a large share of employment in Bangladesh is in the informal sector (88%). Inclusion of these workers in health insurance is a big challenge. Among other barriers, the "literacy gap" for health insurance" is a reason for the low insurance uptake in Bangladesh. The aim of this study is, therefore, to assess the impact of an educational intervention on willingness-to-pay (WTP) for health insurance among informal sector workers in urban Bangladesh.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Philippines 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 146 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Lecturer 9 6%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 35 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 24 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 44 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2022.
All research outputs
#6,398,542
of 25,292,378 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#102
of 493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,911
of 198,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,378 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them