You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
EQUIP: Implementing chronic care principles and applying formative evaluation methods to improve care for schizophrenia: QUERI Series
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, February 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-3-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alison H Brown, Amy N Cohen, Matthew J Chinman, Christopher Kessler, Alexander S Young |
Abstract |
This paper presents a case study that demonstrates the evolution of a project entitled "Enhancing QUality-of-care In Psychosis" (EQUIP) that began approximately when the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs' Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI), and implementation science were emerging. EQUIP developed methods and tools to implement chronic illness care principles in the treatment of schizophrenia, and evaluated this implementation using a small-scale controlled trial. The next iteration of the project, EQUIP-2, was further informed by implementation science and the use of QUERI tools. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 23 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 22% |
Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
Professor | 5 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 9 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 25% |
Psychology | 15 | 19% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Unknown | 17 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2013.
All research outputs
#18,337,420
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,644
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,027
of 157,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.