You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Gut mucosal and plasma concentrations of glutamine: a comparison between two enriched enteral feeding solutions in critically ill patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, October 2003
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-2-13 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jean-Charles Preiser, Daliana Peres-Bota, Pierre Eisendrath, Jean-Louis Vincent, André Van Gossum |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 25% |
Researcher | 4 | 25% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 44% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 13% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2016.
All research outputs
#18,483,671
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,272
of 1,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,661
of 52,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.