You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CNV-TV: A robust method to discover copy number variation from short sequencing reads
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-14-150 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Junbo Duan, Ji-Gang Zhang, Hong-Wen Deng, Yu-Ping Wang |
| Abstract |
Copy number variation (CNV) is an important structural variation (SV) in human genome. Various studies have shown that CNVs are associated with complex diseases. Traditional CNV detection methods such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) suffer from low resolution. The next generation sequencing (NGS) technique promises a higher resolution detection of CNVs and several methods were recently proposed for realizing such a promise. However, the performances of these methods are not robust under some conditions, e.g., some of them may fail to detect CNVs of short sizes. There has been a strong demand for reliable detection of CNVs from high resolution NGS data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Montenegro | 1 | 13% |
| Sweden | 1 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Norway | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 63 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,352,480
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#631
of 7,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,930
of 194,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#19
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.