↓ Skip to main content

WALK 2.0 - Using Web 2.0 applications to promote health-related physical activity: A randomised controlled trial protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
WALK 2.0 - Using Web 2.0 applications to promote health-related physical activity: A randomised controlled trial protocol
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-436
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory S Kolt, Richard R Rosenkranz, Trevor N Savage, Anthony J Maeder, Corneel Vandelanotte, Mitch J Duncan, Cristina M Caperchione, Rhys Tague, Cindy Hooker, W Kerry Mummery

Abstract

Physical inactivity is one of the leading modifiable causes of death and disease in Australia. National surveys indicate less than half of the Australian adult population are sufficiently active to obtain health benefits. The Internet is a potentially important medium for successfully communicating health messages to the general population and enabling individual behaviour change. Internet-based interventions have proven efficacy; however, intervention studies describing website usage objectively have reported a strong decline in usage, and high attrition rate, over the course of the interventions. Web 2.0 applications give users control over web content generated and present innovative possibilities to improve user engagement. There is, however, a need to assess the effectiveness of these applications in the general population. The Walk 2.0 project is a 3-arm randomised controlled trial investigating the effects of "next generation" web-based applications on engagement, retention, and subsequent physical activity behaviour change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 147 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Student > Master 25 16%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 30 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 16%
Psychology 17 11%
Social Sciences 13 9%
Sports and Recreations 9 6%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 37 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,266,363
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,599
of 14,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,125
of 192,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#39
of 308 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 308 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.