↓ Skip to main content

Rifampicin-warfarin interaction leading to macroscopic hematuria: a case report and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 408)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rifampicin-warfarin interaction leading to macroscopic hematuria: a case report and review of the literature
Published in
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/2050-6511-14-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria AP Martins, Adriano MM Reis, Mariana F Sales, Vandack Nobre, Daniel D Ribeiro, Manoel OC Rocha, Antônio LP Ribeiro

Abstract

Rifampicin remains one of the first-line drugs used in tuberculosis therapy. This drug's potential to induce the hepatic cytochrome P450 oxidative enzyme system increases the risk of drug-drug interactions. Thus, although the presence of comorbidities typically necessitates the use of multiple drugs, the co-administration of rifampicin and warfarin may lead to adverse drug events. We report a bleeding episode after termination of the co-administration of rifampicin and warfarin and detail the challenges related to international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 69 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 16 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,803,070
of 21,406,274 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#28
of 408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,202
of 173,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,406,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them