↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the QUEST-RA study

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
377 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the QUEST-RA study
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, March 2008
DOI 10.1186/ar2383
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Naranjo, Tuulikki Sokka, Miguel A Descalzo, Jaime Calvo-Alén, Kim Hørslev-Petersen, Reijo K Luukkainen, Bernard Combe, Gerd R Burmester, Joe Devlin, Gianfranco Ferraccioli, Alessia Morelli, Monique Hoekstra, Maria Majdan, Stefan Sadkiewicz, Miguel Belmonte, Ann-Carin Holmqvist, Ernest Choy, Recep Tunc, Aleksander Dimic, Martin Bergman, Sergio Toloza, Theodore Pincus, the QUEST-RA Group

Abstract

We analyzed the prevalence of cardiovascular (CV) disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and its association with traditional CV risk factors, clinical features of RA, and the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in a multinational cross-sectional cohort of nonselected consecutive outpatients with RA (The Questionnaires in Standard Monitoring of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Program, or QUEST-RA) who were receiving regular clinical care.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 6 2%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 248 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 16%
Other 27 10%
Student > Postgraduate 27 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Student > Master 24 9%
Other 69 26%
Unknown 51 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 139 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 2%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 60 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2016.
All research outputs
#2,607,941
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#515
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,444
of 95,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.