↓ Skip to main content

Inappropriate medication use and risk of falls – A prospective study in a large community-dwelling elderly cohort

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inappropriate medication use and risk of falls – A prospective study in a large community-dwelling elderly cohort
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2318-9-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Berdot, Marion Bertrand, Jean-François Dartigues, Annie Fourrier, Béatrice Tavernier, Karen Ritchie, Annick Alpérovitch

Abstract

Explicit criteria for determining potentially inappropriate medication consumption in elderly were elaborated by Beers et al. These lists have been used worldwide to evaluate medical prescriptions but there is little epidemiologic evidence demonstrating negative consequences of inappropriate medication use. It has been reported that some drugs could increase the risk of falls, which are a frequent and serious problem in elderly population. We aimed to evaluate the association between the use of potentially inappropriate medications and the risk of falls.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 182 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 16%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Other 43 23%
Unknown 30 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 30 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Psychology 8 4%
Sports and Recreations 4 2%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 36 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2013.
All research outputs
#4,581,681
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#1,178
of 3,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,812
of 110,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.