You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effects of crisis plans for patients with psychotic and bipolar disorders: a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-9-41 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A Ruchlewska, CL Mulder, R Smulders, BJ Roosenschoon, G Koopmans, A Wierdsma |
| Abstract |
Crises and (involuntary) admissions have a strong impact on patients and their caregivers. In some countries, including the Netherlands, the number of crises and (involuntary) admissions have increased in the last years. There is also a lack of effective interventions to prevent their occurrence. Previous research has shown that a form of psychiatric advance statement - joint crisis plan - may prevent involuntary admissions, but another study showed no significant results for another form. The question remains which form of psychiatric advance statement may help to prevent crisis situations. This study examines the effects of two other psychiatric advance statements. The first is created by the patient with help from a patient's advocate (Patient Advocate Crisis Plan: PACP) and the second with the help of a clinician only (Clinician facilitated Crisis Plan: CCP). We investigate whether patients with a PACP or CCP show fewer emergency visits and (involuntary) admissions as compared to patients without a psychiatric advance statement. Furthermore, this study seeks to identify possible mechanisms responsible for the effects of a PACP or a CCP. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 18% |
| Researcher | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 22% |
| Unknown | 30 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 57 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 35 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2014.
All research outputs
#2,689,170
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#971
of 4,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,257
of 109,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.