You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A review of health utilities across conditions common in paediatric and adult populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-8-12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean-Eric Tarride, Natasha Burke, Matthias Bischof, Robert B Hopkins, Linda Goeree, Kaitryn Campbell, Feng Xie, Daria O'Reilly, Ron Goeree |
| Abstract |
Cost-utility analyses are commonly used in economic evaluations of interventions or conditions that have an impact on health-related quality of life. However, evaluating utilities in children presents several challenges since young children may not have the cognitive ability to complete measurement tasks and thus utility values must be estimated by proxy assessors. Another solution is to use utilities derived from an adult population. To better inform the future conduct of cost-utility analyses in paediatric populations, we reviewed the published literature reporting utilities among children and adults across selected conditions common to paediatric and adult populations. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 142 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 22% |
| Unknown | 26 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2010.
All research outputs
#6,569,357
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#711
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,641
of 172,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.