↓ Skip to main content

Nut consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer, all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 4,091)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
321 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
530 Mendeley
Title
Nut consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer, all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies
Published in
BMC Medicine, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12916-016-0730-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dagfinn Aune, NaNa Keum, Edward Giovannucci, Lars T. Fadnes, Paolo Boffetta, Darren C. Greenwood, Serena Tonstad, Lars J. Vatten, Elio Riboli, Teresa Norat

Abstract

Although nut consumption has been associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality, data on less common causes of death has not been systematically assessed. Previous reviews missed several studies and additional studies have since been published. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of nut consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer, and all-cause and cause-specific mortality. PubMed and Embase were searched for prospective studies of nut consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer, and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in adult populations published up to July 19, 2016. Summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. The burden of mortality attributable to low nut consumption was calculated for selected regions. Twenty studies (29 publications) were included in the meta-analysis. The summary RRs per 28 grams/day increase in nut intake was for coronary heart disease, 0.71 (95% CI: 0.63-0.80, I(2) = 47%, n = 11), stroke, 0.93 (95% CI: 0.83-1.05, I(2) = 14%, n = 11), cardiovascular disease, 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70-0.88, I(2) = 60%, n = 12), total cancer, 0.85 (95% CI: 0.76-0.94, I(2) = 42%, n = 8), all-cause mortality, 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72-0.84, I(2) = 66%, n = 15), and for mortality from respiratory disease, 0.48 (95% CI: 0.26-0.89, I(2) = 61%, n = 3), diabetes, 0.61 (95% CI: 0.43-0.88, I(2) = 0%, n = 4), neurodegenerative disease, 0.65 (95% CI: 0.40-1.08, I(2) = 5.9%, n = 3), infectious disease, 0.25 (95% CI: 0.07-0.85, I(2) = 54%, n = 2), and kidney disease, 0.27 (95% CI: 0.04-1.91, I(2) = 61%, n = 2). The results were similar for tree nuts and peanuts. If the associations are causal, an estimated 4.4 million premature deaths in the America, Europe, Southeast Asia, and Western Pacific would be attributable to a nut intake below 20 grams per day in 2013. Higher nut intake is associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality, and mortality from respiratory disease, diabetes, and infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 632 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 530 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 525 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 83 16%
Student > Bachelor 69 13%
Researcher 56 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 8%
Other 32 6%
Other 117 22%
Unknown 132 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 66 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 7%
Sports and Recreations 13 2%
Other 66 12%
Unknown 171 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2578. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,952
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#4
of 4,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29
of 418,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.