↓ Skip to main content

Endogenous retroviral promoter exaptation in human cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Mobile DNA, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endogenous retroviral promoter exaptation in human cancer
Published in
Mobile DNA, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13100-016-0080-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Artem Babaian, Dixie L. Mager

Abstract

Cancer arises from a series of genetic and epigenetic changes, which result in abnormal expression or mutational activation of oncogenes, as well as suppression/inactivation of tumor suppressor genes. Aberrant expression of coding genes or long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) with oncogenic properties can be caused by translocations, gene amplifications, point mutations or other less characterized mechanisms. One such mechanism is the inappropriate usage of normally dormant, tissue-restricted or cryptic enhancers or promoters that serve to drive oncogenic gene expression. Dispersed across the human genome, endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) provide an enormous reservoir of autonomous gene regulatory modules, some of which have been co-opted by the host during evolution to play important roles in normal regulation of genes and gene networks. This review focuses on the "dark side" of such ERV regulatory capacity. Specifically, we discuss a growing number of examples of normally dormant or epigenetically repressed ERVs that have been harnessed to drive oncogenes in human cancer, a process we term onco-exaptation, and we propose potential mechanisms that may underlie this phenomenon.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 195 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 19%
Researcher 35 18%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 45 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 72 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 48 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,062,371
of 25,068,002 outputs
Outputs from Mobile DNA
#99
of 359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,231
of 428,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mobile DNA
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,068,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them