↓ Skip to main content

The Microbiome and the Pathophysiology of Asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
31 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Microbiome and the Pathophysiology of Asthma
Published in
Respiratory Research, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12931-016-0479-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashley Sullivan, Eoin Hunt, John MacSharry, Desmond M. Murphy

Abstract

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease whose prevalence is increasing in the western world. Recently research has begun to focus on the role the microbiome plays in asthma pathogenesis in the hope of further understanding this respiratory disorder. Considered sterile until recently, the lungs have revealed themselves to contain a unique microbiota. A shift towards molecular methods for the quantification and sequencing of microbial DNA has revealed that the airways harbour a unique microbiota with apparent, reproducible differences present between healthy and diseased lungs. There is a hope that in classifying the microbial load of the asthmatic airway an insight may be afforded as to the possible role pulmonary microbes may have in propagating an asthmatic airway response. This could potentially pave the way for new therapeutic strategies for the treatment of chronic lung conditions such as asthma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 211 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 12%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Master 23 11%
Other 11 5%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 61 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 68 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,243,239
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#90
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,794
of 416,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#2
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.