You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The delivery of preventive care to clients of community health services
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-167 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathleen M McElwaine, Megan Freund, Elizabeth M Campbell, Jenny Knight, Jennifer A Bowman, Emma L Doherty, Paula M Wye, Luke Wolfenden, Christophe Lecathelinais, Scott McLachlan, John H Wiggers |
| Abstract |
Smoking, poor nutrition, risky alcohol use, and physical inactivity are the primary behavioral risks for common causes of mortality and morbidity. Evidence and guidelines support routine clinician delivery of preventive care. Limited evidence describes the level delivered in community health settings. The objective was to determine the: prevalence of preventive care provided by community health clinicians; association between client and service characteristics and receipt of care; and acceptability of care. This will assist in informing interventions that facilitate adoption of opportunistic preventive care delivery to all clients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 21% |
| Psychology | 12 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2013.
All research outputs
#15,271,180
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,537
of 7,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,456
of 193,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#89
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.