↓ Skip to main content

The screen for cognitive impairment in psychiatry: diagnostic-specific standardization in psychiatric ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The screen for cognitive impairment in psychiatry: diagnostic-specific standardization in psychiatric ill patients
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-13-127
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juana Gómez-Benito, Georgina Guilera, Óscar Pino, Emilio Rojo, Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos, Gemma Safont, Anabel Martínez-Arán, Manuel Franco, Manuel J Cuesta, Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, Miguel Bernardo, Eduard Vieta, Scot E Purdon, Francisco Mesa, Javier Rejas, the Spanish Working Group in Cognitive Function

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP) is a simple and easy to administer scale developed for screening cognitive deficits. This study presents the diagnostic-specific standardization data for this scale in a sample of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder patients. METHODS: Patients between 18 and 55 years who are in a stable phase of the disease, diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder, or bipolar I disorder were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: The SCIP-S was administered to 514 patients (57.9% male), divided into two age groups (18--39 and 40--55 years) and two educational level groups (less than and secondary or higher education). The performance of the patients on the SCIP-S is described and the transformed scores for each SCIP-S subtest, as well as the total score on the instrument, are presented as a percentile, z-score, T-scores, and IQ quotient. CONCLUSIONS: We present the first jointly developed benchmarks for a cognitive screening test exploring functional psychosis (schizophrenia and bipolar disorder), which provide increased information about patient's cognitive abilities. Having guidelines for interpreting SCIP-S scores represents a step forward in the clinical utility of this instrument and adds valuable information for its use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 11 8%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 31 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 25%
Psychology 33 25%
Neuroscience 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 47 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2015.
All research outputs
#14,169,350
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,019
of 4,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,747
of 193,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#56
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.