↓ Skip to main content

Nuclear β-catenin accumulation is associated with increased expression of Nanog protein and predicts poor prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nuclear β-catenin accumulation is associated with increased expression of Nanog protein and predicts poor prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-11-114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xi-Qing Li, Xing-Long Yang, Gong Zhang, Si-Pei Wu, Xu-Bing Deng, Sheng-Jun Xiao, Qiu-Zhen Liu, Kai-Tai Yao, Guang-Hui Xiao

Abstract

Although the prognostic roles of β-catenin expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been reported in several immunohistochemical (IHC) studies, the results were not consistent because some studies lack sufficient number of the positive cases or did not evaluate the subcellular localization features of the protein.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 16 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2013.
All research outputs
#12,584,555
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,408
of 3,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,029
of 193,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#27
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.