↓ Skip to main content

Love thy neighbour: facilitation through an alternative signalling modality in plants

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
46 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
26 Facebook pages
googleplus
8 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Love thy neighbour: facilitation through an alternative signalling modality in plants
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6785-13-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monica Gagliano, Michael Renton

Abstract

Both competitive and facilitative interactions between species play a fundamental role in shaping natural communities. A recent study showed that competitive interactions between plants can be mediated by some alternative signalling channel, extending beyond those channels studied so far (i.e. chemicals, contact and light). Here, we tested whether such alternative pathway also enables facilitative interactions between neighbouring plant species. Specifically, we examined whether the presence of a 'good' neighbouring plant like basil positively influenced the germination of chilli seeds when all known signals were blocked. For this purpose, we used a custom-designed experimental set-up that prevented above- and below-ground contact and blocked chemical and light-mediated signals normally exchange by plants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Japan 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 117 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 24%
Researcher 24 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Master 11 9%
Professor 8 6%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 50%
Environmental Science 13 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Engineering 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 19 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2021.
All research outputs
#335,314
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#60
of 3,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,218
of 206,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.