↓ Skip to main content

A targeted screening method for non‐invasive vascular assessment of the lower limb

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A targeted screening method for non‐invasive vascular assessment of the lower limb
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13047-016-0181-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peta Ellen Tehan, Vivienne Helaine Chuter

Abstract

Podiatrists routinely perform non-invasive lower limb vascular assessment, however frequently cite time as a major barrier in performing regular assessment. The aim of this study was to develop an evidence-based vascular assessment method to guide podiatrists' decision-making processes to aid in timely vascular assessment in at risk populations. The sample underwent brachial pressure measurement, ankle pressures, toe pressure and Doppler waveform with colour duplex ultrasound (CFDU) used as the reference standard. Both the targeted screening method and the American Heart Association (AHA) guideline for vascular screening were then applied to the data set and sensitivity and specificity of each method was calculated. One hundred nineteen participants were included. Sensitivity of the targeted screening method (62%, 95% CI 47.17-75.35) was higher than the AHA method (49%, 95% CI 34.75-63.40), however, specificity of the AHA method (94%, 95% CI 85.62-98.37) was higher than the targeted screening method (85%, 95% CI 74.26-92.60). Diagnostic accuracy was similar with the AHA method yielding 74% diagnostic accuracy and the targeted screening method 73%. The targeted screening method and the broad international guideline demonstrated similar accuracy, however clinicians may save time using the targeted screening method. This study highlights the difficulties in obtaining accuracy in lower limb vascular assessment in general.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 27%
Student > Master 6 23%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 35%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 6 23%