↓ Skip to main content

Experimental traumatic brain injury

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experimental traumatic brain injury
Published in
Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/2040-7378-2-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christiane Albert-Weissenberger, Anna-Leena Sirén

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury, a leading cause of death and disability, is a result of an outside force causing mechanical disruption of brain tissue and delayed pathogenic events which collectively exacerbate the injury. These pathogenic injury processes are poorly understood and accordingly no effective neuroprotective treatment is available so far. Experimental models are essential for further clarification of the highly complex pathology of traumatic brain injury towards the development of novel treatments. Among the rodent models of traumatic brain injury the most commonly used are the weight-drop, the fluid percussion, and the cortical contusion injury models. As the entire spectrum of events that might occur in traumatic brain injury cannot be covered by one single rodent model, the design and choice of a specific model represents a major challenge for neuroscientists. This review summarizes and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the currently available rodent models for traumatic brain injury.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 183 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 25%
Researcher 38 20%
Student > Master 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 20 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 19%
Neuroscience 34 18%
Engineering 15 8%
Psychology 12 6%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 28 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,074,020
of 19,763,264 outputs
Outputs from Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine
#4
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,567
of 169,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,763,264 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one scored the same or higher as 34 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them