You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hepatitis C treatment access and uptake for people who inject drugs: a review mapping the role of social factors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Harm Reduction Journal, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7517-10-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Magdalena Harris, Tim Rhodes |
| Abstract |
Evidence documents successful hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment outcomes for people who inject drugs (PWID) and interest in HCV treatment among this population. Maximising HCV treatment for PWID can be an effective HCV preventative measure. Yet HCV treatment among PWID remains suboptimal. This review seeks to map social factors mediating HCV treatment access. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 25% |
| Canada | 4 | 14% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 11% |
| Scientists | 3 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 233 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 19% |
| Researcher | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 46 | 19% |
| Unknown | 47 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 36 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 13% |
| Psychology | 21 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 58 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,379,684
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Harm Reduction Journal
#222
of 1,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,888
of 205,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Harm Reduction Journal
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them