↓ Skip to main content

The influence of DNA repair on neurological degeneration, cachexia, skin cancer and internal neoplasms: autopsy report of four xeroderma pigmentosum patients (XP-A, XP-C and XP-D)

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica Communications, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The influence of DNA repair on neurological degeneration, cachexia, skin cancer and internal neoplasms: autopsy report of four xeroderma pigmentosum patients (XP-A, XP-C and XP-D)
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/2051-5960-1-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin-Ping Lai, Yen-Chun Liu, Meghna Alimchandani, Qingyan Liu, Phyu Phyu Aung, Kant Matsuda, Chyi-Chia R Lee, Maria Tsokos, Stephen Hewitt, Elisabeth J Rushing, Deborah Tamura, David L Levens, John J DiGiovanna, Howard A Fine, Nicholas Patronas, Sikandar G Khan, David E Kleiner, J Carl Oberholtzer, Martha M Quezado, Kenneth H Kraemer

Abstract

To investigate the association of DNA nucleotide excision repair (NER) defects with neurological degeneration, cachexia and cancer, we performed autopsies on 4 adult xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) patients with different clinical features and defects in NER complementation groups XP-A, XP-C or XP-D.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Other 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 7%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,969,508
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#882
of 1,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,856
of 193,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.