↓ Skip to main content

Acculturation and obesity among migrant populations in high income countries – a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
242 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acculturation and obesity among migrant populations in high income countries – a systematic review
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-458
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maryam Delavari, Anders Larrabee Sønderlund, Boyd Swinburn, David Mellor, Andre Renzaho

Abstract

There is evidence to suggest that immigrant populations from low or medium-income countries to high income countries show a significant change in obesogenic behaviors in the host society, and that these changes are associated with acculturation. However, the results of studies vary depending on how acculturation is measured. The objective of this study is to systematically review the evidence on the relationship between acculturation--as measured with a standardized acculturation scale--and overweight/obesity among adult migrants from low/middle countries to high income countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 337 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 17%
Researcher 39 11%
Student > Bachelor 39 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Other 55 16%
Unknown 64 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 20%
Social Sciences 58 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 16%
Psychology 28 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 6%
Other 32 9%
Unknown 79 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,248,538
of 25,292,646 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,610
of 16,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,058
of 199,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#31
of 291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.