↓ Skip to main content

Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 1,261)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
111 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
456 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1727 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work
Published in
Human Resources for Health, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-11-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan A Nancarrow, Andrew Booth, Steven Ariss, Tony Smith, Pam Enderby, Alison Roots

Abstract

Interdisciplinary team work is increasingly prevalent, supported by policies and practices that bring care closer to the patient and challenge traditional professional boundaries. To date, there has been a great deal of emphasis on the processes of team work, and in some cases, outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 111 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,727 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 1706 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 341 20%
Student > Bachelor 297 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 135 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 123 7%
Researcher 100 6%
Other 334 19%
Unknown 397 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 370 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 266 15%
Social Sciences 164 9%
Psychology 87 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 72 4%
Other 343 20%
Unknown 425 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#440,159
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#19
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,027
of 205,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.