↓ Skip to main content

Impact of clinical and health services research projects on decision-making: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of clinical and health services research projects on decision-making: a qualitative study
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-11-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maite Solans-Domènech, Paula Adam, Imma Guillamón, Gaietà Permanyer-Miralda, Joan MV Pons, Joan Escarrabill

Abstract

This article reports on the impact assessment experience of a funding program of non-commercial clinical and health services research. The aim was to assess the level of implementation of results from a subgroup of research projects (on respiratory diseases), and to detect barriers (or facilitators) in the translation of new knowledge to informed decision-making.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 5%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 75 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Master 11 14%
Librarian 5 6%
Other 3 4%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 21 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 21%
Social Sciences 17 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 20 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2014.
All research outputs
#3,442,036
of 24,814,419 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#503
of 1,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,215
of 197,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,814,419 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.