You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tackling inequalities in obesity: a protocol for a systematic review of the effectiveness of public health interventions at reducing socioeconomic inequalities in obesity among adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-2-27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clare L Bambra, Frances C Hillier, Helen J Moore, Joanne-Marie Cairns-Nagi, Carolyn D Summerbell |
| Abstract |
Socioeconomic inequalities in obesity and associated risk factors for obesity are widening throughout developed countries worldwide. Tackling obesity is high on the public health agenda both in the United Kingdom and internationally. However, what works in terms of interventions that are able to reduce inequalities in obesity is lacking. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 46% |
| Ireland | 2 | 15% |
| Norway | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 31% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 153 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 22% |
| Researcher | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 31% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Psychology | 10 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 35 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2013.
All research outputs
#3,623,766
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#685
of 1,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,295
of 193,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.