↓ Skip to main content

Hospitalized cancer patients with severe sepsis: analysis of incidence, mortality, and associated costs of care

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 6,554)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
65 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
285 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hospitalized cancer patients with severe sepsis: analysis of incidence, mortality, and associated costs of care
Published in
Critical Care, July 2004
DOI 10.1186/cc2893
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark D Williams, Lee Ann Braun, Liesl M Cooper, Joseph Johnston, Richard V Weiss, Rebecca L Qualy, Walter Linde-Zwirble

Abstract

Infection is an important complication in cancer patients, which frequently leads to or prolongs hospitalization, and can also lead to acute organ dysfunction (severe sepsis) and eventually death. While cancer patients are known to be at higher risk for infection and subsequent complications, there is no national estimate of the magnitude of this problem. Our objective was to identify cancer patients with severe sepsis and to project these numbers to national levels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 278 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Master 28 10%
Other 23 8%
Other 67 24%
Unknown 70 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 3%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 77 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 507. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2022.
All research outputs
#50,515
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#6
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34
of 59,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.