↓ Skip to main content

Global health experiences of U.S. Physicians: a mixed methods survey of clinician-researchers and health policy leaders

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global health experiences of U.S. Physicians: a mixed methods survey of clinician-researchers and health policy leaders
Published in
Globalization and Health, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1744-8603-9-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

S Ryan Greysen, Adam K Richards, Sidney Coupet, Mayur M Desai, Aasim I Padela

Abstract

Interest and participation in global health activities among U.S. medical trainees has increased sharply in recent decades, yet the global health activities of physicians who have completed residency training remain understudied. Our objectives were to assess associations between individual characteristics and patterns of post-residency global health activities across the domains of health policy, education, and research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Turkey 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 90 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 14 15%
Researcher 10 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 30 32%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 22 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2013.
All research outputs
#5,379,297
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#747
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,802
of 205,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.