You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of suicide prevention interventions targeting indigenous peoples in Australia, United States, Canada and New Zealand
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-463 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anton C Clifford, Christopher M Doran, Komla Tsey |
| Abstract |
Indigenous peoples of Australia, Canada, United States and New Zealand experience disproportionately high rates of suicide. As such, the methodological quality of evaluations of suicide prevention interventions targeting these Indigenous populations should be rigorously examined, in order to determine the extent to which they are effective for reducing rates of Indigenous suicide and suicidal behaviours. This systematic review aims to: 1) identify published evaluations of suicide prevention interventions targeting Indigenous peoples in Australia, Canada, United States and New Zealand; 2) critique their methodological quality; and 3) describe their main characteristics. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 29% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 41% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 452 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 443 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 96 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 79 | 17% |
| Researcher | 50 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 77 | 17% |
| Unknown | 91 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 19% |
| Psychology | 78 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 67 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 53 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 57 | 13% |
| Unknown | 102 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2020.
All research outputs
#958,283
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,029
of 14,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,914
of 193,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#10
of 285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.