↓ Skip to main content

A critical review of the research literature on Six Sigma, Lean and StuderGroup's Hardwiring Excellence in the United States: the need to demonstrate and communicate the effectiveness of…

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
166 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
391 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A critical review of the research literature on Six Sigma, Lean and StuderGroup's Hardwiring Excellence in the United States: the need to demonstrate and communicate the effectiveness of transformation strategies in healthcare
Published in
Implementation Science, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-4-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua R Vest, Larry D Gamm

Abstract

U.S. healthcare organizations are confronted with numerous and varied transformational strategies promising improvements along all dimensions of quality and performance. This article examines the peer-reviewed literature from the U.S. for evidence of effectiveness among three current popular transformational strategies: Six Sigma, Lean/Toyota Production System, and Studer's Hardwiring Excellence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 391 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
Mexico 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 371 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 90 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 17%
Researcher 32 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 8%
Student > Bachelor 24 6%
Other 93 24%
Unknown 56 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 83 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 82 21%
Engineering 68 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 6%
Social Sciences 15 4%
Other 49 13%
Unknown 71 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2014.
All research outputs
#3,259,552
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#709
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,570
of 109,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.