↓ Skip to main content

The effect of obesity on treatment outcomes for low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of obesity on treatment outcomes for low back pain
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12998-016-0129-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stanley C. Ewald, Eric L. Hurwitz, Anupama Kizhakkeveettil

Abstract

The objective of this study was to estimate the effect of obesity, as measured by body mass index (BMI), on treatment outcomes for low back pain (LBP). Data from the University of California, Los Angeles, and Friendly Hills Healthcare Network low back pain study (collected from 1995 to 2000) were used to perform a secondary data analysis of this randomized clinical trial on adults who sought care for LBP. BMI was the primary predictor variable. Binary logistic regression modeling was performed to estimate odds ratios adjusted for the effects of confounders. Using normal weight as the referent population, underweight and overweight populations did not display significant odds ratios for any of the outcome variables. The obese population demonstrated odds ratios of 0.615 (0.379, 0.998) for improvement of disability and 0.550 (0.341, 0.889) for improvement of most severe back pain. The results of this study support an association between obesity and less effective treatment outcomes whether measured by disability (Roland-Morris scale) or pain (most severe pain NRS). Overweight and underweight populations do not appear to have significantly different outcomes than normal weight populations. This trial was designed and conducted prior to the advent of registries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 19%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Other 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 15 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 19%
Sports and Recreations 5 9%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 14 24%