↓ Skip to main content

The Perioperative Surgical Home: how can it make the case so everyone wins?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Perioperative Surgical Home: how can it make the case so everyone wins?
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2253-13-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas R Vetter, Lee A Goeddel, Arthur M Boudreaux, Thomas R Hunt, Keith A Jones, Jean-Francois Pittet

Abstract

Varied and fragmented care plans undertaken by different practitioners currently expose surgical patients to lapses in expected care, increase the chance for operational mistakes and accidents, and often result in unnecessary care. The Perioperative Surgical Home has thus been proposed by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and other stakeholders as an innovative, patient-centered, surgical continuity of care model that incorporates shared decision making. Topics central to the debate about an anesthesiology-based Perioperative Surgical Home include: holding the gains made in anesthesia-related patient safety; impacting surgical morbidity and mortality, including failure-to-rescue; achieving healthcare outcome metrics; assimilating comparative effectiveness research into the model; establishing necessary audit and data collection; a comparison with the hospitalist model of perioperative care; the perspective of the surgeon; the benefits of the Perioperative Surgical Home to the specialty of anesthesiology; and its associated healthcare economic advantages.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 129 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 16%
Other 14 11%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Other 37 28%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 9%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 25 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2015.
All research outputs
#13,943,270
of 24,837,507 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#395
of 1,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,930
of 200,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,837,507 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,665 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.