↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of olanzapine for treatment of patients with bipolar depression: Japanese subpopulation analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and safety of olanzapine for treatment of patients with bipolar depression: Japanese subpopulation analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-13-138
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hideaki Katagiri, Mauricio Tohen, David P McDonnell, Shinji Fujikoshi, Michael Case, Shigenobu Kanba, Michihiro Takahashi, Juan-Carlos Gomez

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of olanzapine monotherapy are evaluated in Japanese patients from a large, global study of bipolar depression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 114 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 29 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 25%
Psychology 23 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 34 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,428,765
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,451
of 4,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,411
of 194,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#44
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.