You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Developing population interventions with migrant women for maternal-child health: a focused ethnography
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-471 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anita J Gagnon, Franco Carnevale, Praem Mehta, Hélène Rousseau, Donna E Stewart |
Abstract |
Literature describing effective population interventions related to the pregnancy, birth, and post-birth care of international migrants, as defined by them, is scant. Hence, we sought to determine: 1) what processes are used by migrant women to respond to maternal-child health and psychosocial concerns during the early months and years after birth; 2) which of these enhance or impede their resiliency; and 3) which population interventions they suggest best respond to these concerns. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 22% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
Spain | 1 | 11% |
Germany | 1 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 247 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 59 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 13% |
Researcher | 25 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
Other | 35 | 14% |
Unknown | 57 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 16% |
Psychology | 35 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 28 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
Other | 25 | 10% |
Unknown | 64 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,580,508
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,898
of 14,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,938
of 194,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#57
of 288 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 288 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.